i own an awesome website where you can make money online..most our users are making like 20-50 bucks a day.. with minimal work.. its pretty simple to do.. its actually so easy to do you won’t believe ill actually pay you to do it.. and its 100% free to sign up and try.

another positive about my site unlike all the other sites.. i will pay you out daily.. so you earn 5 bucks in the first 5 minutes you work on my site.. request a payout and i will pay you out right then.. i guarantee no other sites like mine will pay out daily multiple times..

i’d be glad to help you.. if you sign up..
http://tinyurl.com/6255qv

Nor does having a universal health system mean you’re a bunch of communists, or even socialists – Australia’s medical system means everyone has access to hospitals when they need them, and yet – strange as this may seem – we’re not a bunch of pinkos. Last week, my partner was rushed to hospital with a problem with his heart. He doesn’t have any insurance. He spent four days in the cardiac ward, and when he came home on Saturday, we didn’t get a bill. You know what? That’s a good thing. Why on earth should someone only be treated if they can pay? Is a poor person’s life somehow intrinsically worth less than a rich person’s life? Seems to me money isn’t a very good way of working out someone’s value as a human being.

Yes, sometimes you might have to wait for an operation – if it’s an *elective* procedure. If you have a life-threatening condition – something wrong with your heart, or a burst appendix or something like that, you’re whisked straight into hospital and operated on straight away. Without being presented with a giant bill at the end of it.

I fail to see why Americans keep arguing against universal health care, when it works so well elsewhere in the world.

what’d ya think? probably I’ll wait to have this conversation with her until after the state mandated sex education she’ll have forced on her two years before puberty.

I do not think that “collectivism” is the way to go, but humans are social primates, and like other great apes, they will probably be happier if they live among a group of people who seem to care whether they live or die. Also, if Randian sociopathic individualism is combined with a legal and economic system that makes it very easy for the rich man to get richer while the poor man bears the burdens, you cannot expect the poor man to be thrilled about it forever. The Filipinos did eventually stand up and kick Imelda and her shoe collection out.

Probably all of us have ancestors who had ten kids. Yes, maybe if your wife’s mother had had access to birth control she would not have existed, but so what? Every time a woman chooses not to have one more child, some potential person does not come into existence. Are you arguing that women should feel morally required to produce as many children as possible? Unless you think the rapture is coming real soon, or have plans to return the death rate to historically high norms, you apparently don’t understand how fast the planet would fill up with human beings. And if you are teaching your daughter to “hate and fear” people who simply want to place decisions on women’s fecundity into women’s hands… well, I feel sorry for the girl, but you may be surprised to find that she doesn’t hold to that ideology when she’s old enough to decide for herself.

But putting the abhorrences of corn fed rednecks falling for pretty Asian girls from big families aside for a moment; this discussion seems to be spurned on by the idea of what would be fair for people like my family-in-law in third world countries. Fair is that they had a daughter who could go to where things are better and support them by sending money home. It’s that simple, it sucks there and they can’t change that; and they can’t all get up and leave, but if one of them can make a better life for herself in the USA or Hong Kong or as a merchant marine, and everyone back home is a little better off, then they feel that they’ve been given a fair shake. This is from people who lost their homes and everything but their lives after Mt. Pinatubo blew and had to live as refugees for the better part of two years with 4 children to feed and no one but their family helping them out. Maybe you can continue to project your communal sensitivities onto their situation and perpetuate the myth that collectivism is what they’d find “Fair” but that’s not reality. These are proud people who have been through a lot, they’re a little better off than most of their neighbors but nowhere near as well off as rich people. if some government took from the rich and redistributed to the poor they’d worry that they were next and find the whole thing very unfair. And, if their poorer neighbors saw that the opportunity to have children who who could go and live a better life elsewere being taken from them, they too would find that unfair.

So, I do care that my little brother-in-law and sister-in-law in a third world country get adequate health care and education for a better life, and I go to work and send them some of my earnings to make that very thing happen. But the question remains why should we care about some kid in Africa ? Why isn’t someone in her family doing the same for her ? You’re right that everyone on earth can’t live like rich Americans, but you’re wrong to assume that they’d only be happy if every last one of them was.