Comments on: Peeling the Onion: What's Behind the Financial Mess?

By: Liquidation

Liquidation — Sun, 07 Aug 2011 15:48:16 +0000

Isn’t it illegal to give financial incentive to clients to get their business other than a max of $100 gift?

By: sikisizle

sikisizle — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:27:49 +0000

I have never imagined that there weren’t any need in big initial investment.

By: ppi claim back

ppi claim back — Thu, 19 May 2011 08:10:59 +0000

I posted about this earlier on my own blog. Your article has actually given me some food for thought, I feel you’ve got made many very intriguing points. I want I would discovered it earlier, prior to writing my own post.

By: vibram five fingers kso

vibram five fingers kso — Fri, 06 May 2011 11:29:53 +0000

Thanks for the write-up. I have often noticed that almost all people are needing to lose weight because they wish to show up slim and attractive. Nonetheless, they do not continually realize that there are many benefits for losing weight in addition. Doctors claim that over weight people experience a variety of ailments that can be instantly attributed to their own excess weight. Fortunately that people who definitely are overweight and also suffering from various diseases can help to eliminate the severity of their own illnesses by simply losing weight. It is easy to see a continuous but identifiable improvement in health when even a slight amount of fat loss is obtained gywl56.

By: multifonction

multifonction — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:34:32 +0000

Compassionate for the huge scrutiny, but I’m truly gaga the new Zune, and wish this, as cured as the excellent reviews whatsoever else fill fuck cursive, faculty refrain you adjudicate if it’s the reactionary choice for you.

By: Dale

Dale — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:56:12 +0000

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh… , so that’s why the 1960s programs, to control population, were killed.

By: At Home with the Numbers Game.. or John Michael Greer is Singing my Song! [Casaubon's Book] « Random Information

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:32:23 +0000

[...] huge portions of the population out of the informal economy and into the formal one. in my essay "Peeling the Onion" I track the history of these moves – from the 1930s into the 1970s, the massive elimination of [...]

By: At Home with the Numbers Game.. or John Michael Greer is Singing my Song! [Casaubon's Book] | Death By Cucumber | Great News In No Time

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:50:11 +0000

[...] huge portions of the population out of the formal economy and into the informal one. in my essay “Peeling the Onion” I track the history of these moves – from the 1930s into the 1970s, the massive elimination [...]

By: Andrew

Andrew — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:10:25 +0000

Great blog – good, but scary, thought pattern on how economies work.

Just wanted to comment on the debate surrounding “division of labour”. There is some truth to the fact that some are better at doing things then others.

However….
I think we need to approach life as a generalist first, at least to the level of being somewhat self-reliant (however you define it). After this crucial step you are now useful to others either to help or to barter. And if you are useful, helpful, and open to barter then you are on your way to building trust and community via exchange (again, depends how you define these last terms). After trust and community, I would then agree more with the “division of labour” thought pattern.

In a nutshell, being an actualist, you can’t get from here (crisis) to there (division of labour / community) without that crucial step of being a generalist, even an inefficient one, for a while.

By: The Borg: A Financial Allegory | The Oil Report

The Borg: A Financial Allegory | The Oil Report — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:32:48 +0000

[...] materials. See: http://www.chrismartenson.com/ 2Thanks to Sharon Astyk for describing this: http://sharonastyk.com/2008/09/25/peeling-the-onion-whats-behind-the-fin…; 3 I am using the scientific notation for naming species, i.e., Genus species Author, and the [...]