<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard Realities: Why Understating the Cost of Dealing With Climate Change Hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/</link>
	<description>Finding the keys to the future…and trying not to lose them in the mess.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:38:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lashawn Ghea</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-110334</link>
		<dc:creator>Lashawn Ghea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 01:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-110334</guid>
		<description>hi!,I love your writing so a lot! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I need a specialist on this space to resolve my problem. Maybe that is you! Having a look ahead to peer you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi!,I love your writing so a lot! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I need a specialist on this space to resolve my problem. Maybe that is you! Having a look ahead to peer you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massivholzdielen</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-46450</link>
		<dc:creator>massivholzdielen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-46450</guid>
		<description>fertig parkett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fertig parkett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramonita Brissey</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-46397</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramonita Brissey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-46397</guid>
		<description>Adele has discussed plans to write, record as well as produce her next studio lp all by herself.  She has at present written seven tracks intended for the record and would like the new material to be much more stripped-back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adele has discussed plans to write, record as well as produce her next studio lp all by herself.  She has at present written seven tracks intended for the record and would like the new material to be much more stripped-back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael Holoman</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-45943</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael Holoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-45943</guid>
		<description>Here is the type of information I&#039;ve long been searching for. Thanks for posting this information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the type of information I&#8217;ve long been searching for. Thanks for posting this information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vera</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-13490</link>
		<dc:creator>vera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-13490</guid>
		<description>&quot;we lose control of climate change&quot;

We&#039;ve never had it to start with!

&quot;If we get 2 degrees of warming, then it doesn’t matter what we do with our emissions, runaway climate change becomes inevitable.&quot;

And what the heck does THAT mean? The earth and humanity have survived all manner of global warmings. Put a sock in it, panicmongers!

The real danger is wasting our remaining resources on green gadgetry. Bah humbug.

Claire, you got it right. Certainty is what gets us every time, and you bet there are people all lined up to profit from the coming &quot;green&quot; bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we lose control of climate change&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve never had it to start with!</p>
<p>&#8220;If we get 2 degrees of warming, then it doesn’t matter what we do with our emissions, runaway climate change becomes inevitable.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what the heck does THAT mean? The earth and humanity have survived all manner of global warmings. Put a sock in it, panicmongers!</p>
<p>The real danger is wasting our remaining resources on green gadgetry. Bah humbug.</p>
<p>Claire, you got it right. Certainty is what gets us every time, and you bet there are people all lined up to profit from the coming &#8220;green&#8221; bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-13489</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-13489</guid>
		<description>Great post, Sharon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Sharon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-13488</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-13488</guid>
		<description>after 5 years of living with the land, and 5 years of reducing our carbon footprint and becoming subsistence farmers, its hard to see my low carbon reality now as poorer or less.
we have abundance in so many ways.

but we had to leave the UK to do it, as uk planning laws dont allow people to live on their land.
land reform is what is needed to offset peak oil

the future may mean less of some things - plastic crap, stupid jobs, stress, living off someone elses labour - but if we start making the changes properly now, we may find that we gain more of the things that really matter - healthy food, excercise, community, free time!

unfortunately though, we are perhaps in a bind, as switching to a land based society will take energy and worsen climate, so most of us probably have to make the best of where we are now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after 5 years of living with the land, and 5 years of reducing our carbon footprint and becoming subsistence farmers, its hard to see my low carbon reality now as poorer or less.<br />
we have abundance in so many ways.</p>
<p>but we had to leave the UK to do it, as uk planning laws dont allow people to live on their land.<br />
land reform is what is needed to offset peak oil</p>
<p>the future may mean less of some things &#8211; plastic crap, stupid jobs, stress, living off someone elses labour &#8211; but if we start making the changes properly now, we may find that we gain more of the things that really matter &#8211; healthy food, excercise, community, free time!</p>
<p>unfortunately though, we are perhaps in a bind, as switching to a land based society will take energy and worsen climate, so most of us probably have to make the best of where we are now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>Well, things don&#039;t look good at all - I just read the post on Grist that you referred to. But I also believe that sacrifice, treating unseen people and future generations as being as real as each of us is, is possible too. Probably more prevalent than any of us realize, because the dominant tale carried by mass media is get yours now while you can.

My DH and I have reduced our natural gas consumption by 62% compared to our 1990 consumption. We&#039;ve reduced electricity use by 37% compared to 1990. This is with all mainstream technology. Our house looks like any other. No one can tell we&#039;ve done anything till I tell them our electric or natural gas bill. We still have a fridge, hot water heater, central AC even. At this point, we still use them.

To get where we are now, we sacrificed, in the sense that we spent the two inheritances we&#039;ve received to date on very energy-efficient appliances and on a very thorough program to seal all air leaks, seal and insulate ductwork, and add lots and lots of insulation. That was instead of spending it on &quot;something for ourselves&quot; as mass media advertising would have had us do. In some sense it hasn&#039;t really been a sacrifice, though, not when our last month&#039;s electric bill was $22 and our last month&#039;s natural gas bill was $115 (both very low for this area for wintertime). We do sacrifice a little since we keep the thermostat at 65 degrees during the day (58 at night). We also use AC less than most, but not none. We live in Missouri, where summers are reliably hot and humid and most people run AC for three or four months. We usually run ours for 3 to 6 weeks depending on the summer.

But I think we still have to do a lot more, and the next bit will be much harder. We have to reduce driving more than we have, maybe to almost zero, difficult in our large metro area where many of our friends, and our Zen Center, are 20 miles from home. I can stand loss of AC as the basement stays cool, but loss of heat in the winter ... we&#039;ll glass in the south facing front porch and that will help at times, but I will miss central heating a whole lot, and central hot water more. We&#039;ve camped without refrigeration, but right now we depend on it as our cooking and eating style involves making enough for leftovers. But if I didn&#039;t know how bad things are now and how much worse they are likely to get, I wouldn&#039;t be able to push myself to make these last choices (keep reminding me I need to!). The first set weren&#039;t nearly the sacrifices that the last set will be. I think Sharon&#039;s point is a good one: unless we let people know the enormity of the situation and acknowledge that it will be very difficult to make the changes it looks like we need to make, no one will want to sign on. I think she argues too - certainly it&#039;s in D &amp; A - that we gain some things as well with the sacrifice. So let&#039;s be as honest as we can be, yet remember to offer that some good comes out of this even for us - less money spent on wasteful stuff, hopefully closer friendships, family relations, and community ties.

In the end, Gaia has the last say. So we can also acknowledge we aren&#039;t in control, we don&#039;t know for sure what will happen, whatever we do or don&#039;t do. One of the things we need to give up is certainty. Our hold on life, our place in the universe, is far more precarious than we like to think. With lots of cheap energy, it was easy to think we had control. Remembering in our bones and being that we don&#039;t have control, really getting in touch with our fragility, may be the most difficult and most necessary thing for us to do. We don&#039;t know what the future will bring, but we still need to do what the moment needs from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, things don&#8217;t look good at all &#8211; I just read the post on Grist that you referred to. But I also believe that sacrifice, treating unseen people and future generations as being as real as each of us is, is possible too. Probably more prevalent than any of us realize, because the dominant tale carried by mass media is get yours now while you can.</p>
<p>My DH and I have reduced our natural gas consumption by 62% compared to our 1990 consumption. We&#8217;ve reduced electricity use by 37% compared to 1990. This is with all mainstream technology. Our house looks like any other. No one can tell we&#8217;ve done anything till I tell them our electric or natural gas bill. We still have a fridge, hot water heater, central AC even. At this point, we still use them.</p>
<p>To get where we are now, we sacrificed, in the sense that we spent the two inheritances we&#8217;ve received to date on very energy-efficient appliances and on a very thorough program to seal all air leaks, seal and insulate ductwork, and add lots and lots of insulation. That was instead of spending it on &#8220;something for ourselves&#8221; as mass media advertising would have had us do. In some sense it hasn&#8217;t really been a sacrifice, though, not when our last month&#8217;s electric bill was $22 and our last month&#8217;s natural gas bill was $115 (both very low for this area for wintertime). We do sacrifice a little since we keep the thermostat at 65 degrees during the day (58 at night). We also use AC less than most, but not none. We live in Missouri, where summers are reliably hot and humid and most people run AC for three or four months. We usually run ours for 3 to 6 weeks depending on the summer.</p>
<p>But I think we still have to do a lot more, and the next bit will be much harder. We have to reduce driving more than we have, maybe to almost zero, difficult in our large metro area where many of our friends, and our Zen Center, are 20 miles from home. I can stand loss of AC as the basement stays cool, but loss of heat in the winter &#8230; we&#8217;ll glass in the south facing front porch and that will help at times, but I will miss central heating a whole lot, and central hot water more. We&#8217;ve camped without refrigeration, but right now we depend on it as our cooking and eating style involves making enough for leftovers. But if I didn&#8217;t know how bad things are now and how much worse they are likely to get, I wouldn&#8217;t be able to push myself to make these last choices (keep reminding me I need to!). The first set weren&#8217;t nearly the sacrifices that the last set will be. I think Sharon&#8217;s point is a good one: unless we let people know the enormity of the situation and acknowledge that it will be very difficult to make the changes it looks like we need to make, no one will want to sign on. I think she argues too &#8211; certainly it&#8217;s in D &amp; A &#8211; that we gain some things as well with the sacrifice. So let&#8217;s be as honest as we can be, yet remember to offer that some good comes out of this even for us &#8211; less money spent on wasteful stuff, hopefully closer friendships, family relations, and community ties.</p>
<p>In the end, Gaia has the last say. So we can also acknowledge we aren&#8217;t in control, we don&#8217;t know for sure what will happen, whatever we do or don&#8217;t do. One of the things we need to give up is certainty. Our hold on life, our place in the universe, is far more precarious than we like to think. With lots of cheap energy, it was easy to think we had control. Remembering in our bones and being that we don&#8217;t have control, really getting in touch with our fragility, may be the most difficult and most necessary thing for us to do. We don&#8217;t know what the future will bring, but we still need to do what the moment needs from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WNC Observer</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-13486</link>
		<dc:creator>WNC Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-13486</guid>
		<description>I hate it, it is tragic, but I&#039;m afraid we must face up to the reality of it: We&#039;re cooked.

Most of the damage has already been done, we are apparently already past a tipping point, and the global climate is going to change in a very unfavorable way.

It is the old Prisoner&#039;s Dilemma non-zero-sum game. If the whole world cooperates together, then we might just have a real chance to at least mitigate. However, the temptation is to leave it to everyone else, continue with BAU in your own country, and reap the profits, while everyone else is stuck with the sacrifice. In non-zero-sum games, everyone usually loses. Absent an effective world government (which isn&#039;t going to happen), whatever is done will be done by too few, and thus be too little, too late.

At this point, we had best just focus on preventing our extinction as a species, which is starting to look like a real possibility. I don&#039;t know how many species or ecosystems we can remove before the whole web of life collapses, but we had better find out, and do whatever it takes to make sure that we at least level off well short of that point. As Samuel Johnson said, the prospect of being hanged in a fortnight wonderfully concentrates one&#039;s mind. Maybe the prospect of extinction will have a similar effect on humankind&#039;s collective consciousness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate it, it is tragic, but I&#8217;m afraid we must face up to the reality of it: We&#8217;re cooked.</p>
<p>Most of the damage has already been done, we are apparently already past a tipping point, and the global climate is going to change in a very unfavorable way.</p>
<p>It is the old Prisoner&#8217;s Dilemma non-zero-sum game. If the whole world cooperates together, then we might just have a real chance to at least mitigate. However, the temptation is to leave it to everyone else, continue with BAU in your own country, and reap the profits, while everyone else is stuck with the sacrifice. In non-zero-sum games, everyone usually loses. Absent an effective world government (which isn&#8217;t going to happen), whatever is done will be done by too few, and thus be too little, too late.</p>
<p>At this point, we had best just focus on preventing our extinction as a species, which is starting to look like a real possibility. I don&#8217;t know how many species or ecosystems we can remove before the whole web of life collapses, but we had better find out, and do whatever it takes to make sure that we at least level off well short of that point. As Samuel Johnson said, the prospect of being hanged in a fortnight wonderfully concentrates one&#8217;s mind. Maybe the prospect of extinction will have a similar effect on humankind&#8217;s collective consciousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-13485</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharonastyk.com/2009/01/26/hard-realities-why-understating-the-cost-of-dealing-with-climate-change-hurts/#comment-13485</guid>
		<description>Re:China, India, Africa et al - Brad, I tend to disagree with you - have you seen the recent Chinese report that makes precisely the argument that they are willing to reduce emissions - although not below the level of meeting basic needs.  Up until now, the rich world&#039;s argument has been &quot;we&#039;ll be cutting back a little on our showers, you need to stop trying to bring electricity and running water to your poor.&quot;  That argument is doomed to failure - period.  China, India and Russia have made it clear that they will not accept a radically double standard.  So the question becomes how do we get the world to something that even remotely resembles a single standard - enough to be politically feasible. And that&#039;s my particular interest here - I think that the narrative of climate accord has, thus far, run precisely contrary to the one you describe - instead of placing all the demands on the rich world, the rich world has used the fact that the Global South, having received their media exports, now wants something like the lifestyle as an excuse - China is often our rhetorical reason for not acting on climate change.  This is ridiculous - most of the warming we are experiencing right now is from emissions made decades ago - that is, by us.  We led the way into this mess, if we won&#039;t lead out, there&#039;s no way out.

Sharon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:China, India, Africa et al &#8211; Brad, I tend to disagree with you &#8211; have you seen the recent Chinese report that makes precisely the argument that they are willing to reduce emissions &#8211; although not below the level of meeting basic needs.  Up until now, the rich world&#8217;s argument has been &#8220;we&#8217;ll be cutting back a little on our showers, you need to stop trying to bring electricity and running water to your poor.&#8221;  That argument is doomed to failure &#8211; period.  China, India and Russia have made it clear that they will not accept a radically double standard.  So the question becomes how do we get the world to something that even remotely resembles a single standard &#8211; enough to be politically feasible. And that&#8217;s my particular interest here &#8211; I think that the narrative of climate accord has, thus far, run precisely contrary to the one you describe &#8211; instead of placing all the demands on the rich world, the rich world has used the fact that the Global South, having received their media exports, now wants something like the lifestyle as an excuse &#8211; China is often our rhetorical reason for not acting on climate change.  This is ridiculous &#8211; most of the warming we are experiencing right now is from emissions made decades ago &#8211; that is, by us.  We led the way into this mess, if we won&#8217;t lead out, there&#8217;s no way out.</p>
<p>Sharon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

