Post-Apocalyptic Novel - Dies the Fire
Sharon September 8th, 2008
Welcome to “Energy Apocalypse” Month, always a subject near and dear to my heart, of course. And SM Stirling’s _Dies the Fire_ to me always seems like a cookie of a book - flat, sweet, the occasional delicious chocolate chip, the occasional weird, slightly off-raisin . It suffers from “apocalyptic novel disease” in which the apocalypse itself, dramatic as it is, is insufficient to keep the story going, so we have to have a cartoon bad guy too. You’d think that the survival of our two small plucky bands, and the taking over of the world by the SCA would be sufficient for a novel, but no, Stirling gets bored with that right out, and we move on to the evil dude and the evil dude’s machinations. Stirling even makes fun of his own evil dude, saying that no one is really that evil, but goes on to write three books about him and his doings, and of course, his defeat by our plucky bands of allies.
Of course, I’m mostly interested in the “how do we adapt to the fact that all gizmos plus guns don’t work” goes. While I think few of us have to worry much about “Alien Space Bats” changing the laws of physics, it does offer a fun bit of fantasy about a low (or rather, no) power world.
Some things I think are probably right were the (unlikely) transition from a high tech to a low tech society to happen quite quickly:
1. The the nuclear family is simply too small - organizations are at the tribe/clan/community institution/warlord level. If you want to expand, you need to figure out how to have an autonomous subgroup with formal alliances. But fundamentally, in a very low energy world, small groups of a few dozen to a few hundred make a lot more sense that large state-sized organizations or small nuclear families.
2. Organizational motifs vary quite a lot, but they tend to have strong narrative/story/religious components - that is, people will need to create a history and a story about who they are and why. Thus, the book of the bear clan, the religious culture of Juniper’s group, etc…
Things I think would be damned unlikely, even if thing otherwise occurred as Stirling projects.
1. That the SCA would take over the earth. No offense to the SCA, but while some people join just because they want to do medieval style stuff, most participants I’ve met (and I’ve met quite a few) find the SCA to be a geek subculture. This is not bad - I participate in several geek subcultures myself, although not that one. But generally the sorting process that gets people engaged into geek subcultures and out of mainstream ones is partly preferential, but also includes a hefty dose of well, geekiness. It isn’t terribly unlikely that the SCA could produce a few mainstream leaders, but “few” would be the operative term. I’ve heard someone refer to this book as “self-indulgent” and I think that pretty much covers it in a host of ways.
2. That self-organization would in fact, occur quite so quickly - warlords get the idea right off, the bearkillers start recruiting and their long march (and no one dies, except the inconvenient mother figure, who was toasted anyway). Everyone figures everything out right away, everyone has immediate occasion to try and fire their guns (because of course, there are so many bad guys roaming around Oregon) - this seems very unrealistic to me. Much more likely is that the pace of understanding, and unfolding occurs much more slowly.
The books are fun, but I admit, I get bored by the bad guys, and bored by the wargames bits. What did the rest of you think?
Sharon